ok... here is the plan.
i moved to this congregation years ago, but when i came it was the same secretary then as it is now.
when i arrived he just said "here is my address, give it to the secretary in your old congregation and tell him to send me your records.
I am not moving, that is the thing.
Besides, I want to have my records and at the same time make both congregations think that the other has my records. This way they will both think I am carrying on as normal at the other location, when in actual fact I am freeeeee!!!!!!!!!!
ok... here is the plan.
i moved to this congregation years ago, but when i came it was the same secretary then as it is now.
when i arrived he just said "here is my address, give it to the secretary in your old congregation and tell him to send me your records.
"So, your plan should not work, unless you can count on some sloppy procedures."
As I said in my original post, our local secretary is very easy going, I am hoping that this will help me to pull it off. What if I get caught though, do you think I would be disfellowshiped?
"I'm sure there's still a copy of your records at some central location"
I am sure that there is. But the beauty of my plan is that both congregations will think that the other congregation has my records. They will both think that I am the other congregation's responsibility and so - I can drift quietly away without a peep from either body of elders.
Will it work?
ok... here is the plan.
i moved to this congregation years ago, but when i came it was the same secretary then as it is now.
when i arrived he just said "here is my address, give it to the secretary in your old congregation and tell him to send me your records.
I know that I can ask to see my files. But that would make them suspicious, wouldn't it?
Besides, I want to have the records to myself. I don't want them to have records on me of any kind.
Anyway, the main point is that I want to belong to no congregation, so that I do not have elders anywhere breathing down my neck all the time.
ok... here is the plan.
i moved to this congregation years ago, but when i came it was the same secretary then as it is now.
when i arrived he just said "here is my address, give it to the secretary in your old congregation and tell him to send me your records.
OK... here is the plan.
I moved to this congregation years ago, but when I came it was the same secretary then as it is now. When I arrived he just said "here is my address, give it to the secretary in your old congregation and tell him to send me your records." This I did, and now my records are here with this congregation. Now this is my plan to get my records all to myself:
I will say to the secretary that I am moving back to my old congregation. I will tell him he has moved address though. I say, "I will give you his new address so you can send him my records." Because he was so easy going about everything when I arrived, he may go for this now. Then shall I proceed to give unto him a false address, in fact the address indeed of a friend of mine in the territory of my old congregation. My friend will get the records delivered to him, and then they will be all mine. I will then be in no congregation at all, and accountable to no body of elders.
I am throwing this plan open to all you experienced apostates because I would greatly value comments that will help me to execute it effectively. Are their any fatal flaws in my cunning plan?
i have noticed that there is a tendency in this group to speak injuriously of glorious ones.
in an attempt to help us be more "balanced" in this regard i invite all to share which governing body members they like.
who is your favourite governing body member?
Where did you meet brother Barr Matty?
i have noticed that there is a tendency in this group to speak injuriously of glorious ones.
in an attempt to help us be more "balanced" in this regard i invite all to share which governing body members they like.
who is your favourite governing body member?
Thanks for the info on Jaracz.
christendom teaches that there are three persons in one substance.
yet there is not three gods but one god.
what could be more unscriptural and illogical?
My parents are not witnesses.
Of course the purpose of the Trinity brochure is to disprove the Trinity, that "long time accepted christian belief", are you saying that they should not be allowed to challenge such a "long time accepted christian belief."?
I do not think that the quote is out of context, and I think that all quotes are "incomplete" by virtue of the fact that some sort of decision has to be made: what to include, what not to include.
I have read the paragraph about the princes and 1925 a few times, I still don't understand what you are saying.
christendom teaches that there are three persons in one substance.
yet there is not three gods but one god.
what could be more unscriptural and illogical?
No, I have never spoken to you before. And yes, I really think that.
i have noticed that there is a tendency in this group to speak injuriously of glorious ones.
in an attempt to help us be more "balanced" in this regard i invite all to share which governing body members they like.
who is your favourite governing body member?
But they all do, why him in particular?
i have noticed that there is a tendency in this group to speak injuriously of glorious ones.
in an attempt to help us be more "balanced" in this regard i invite all to share which governing body members they like.
who is your favourite governing body member?
There seems to be a lot of anti-Jaracz feeling, can someone tell me what the guy done to deserve it?
